Duck and Cover

To be honest, there isn't much worth looting in Klamath, for raiders. Cept the one Elvis painting

For the ones that think vasikka post was a justification , he is kidding ...
raiders would try to steal everything even womens , even if they had nothing to steal they would just killing everyone for the fun of it and for the reputation

Yeah well, I guess they'd do that, rape the women. I don't think they would slaughter everyone, there wouldn't be anything left to loot next time!

And I don't think they're just wandering and randomly raiding towns and hitting caravans. Raiders are organized and they have their own strongholds and leaders.

klamath has more or less the same number of people shady sands had in fallout 1 ...

Shady Sands also came from a vault and they had ver little technology ...

but they had a G.E.C.K.. That's what Klamath didn't have. So Shady got the walls from Geck and Klamath...

Also, i don't think the Den people would want to raid Klamath as it is Den's trading partner, well sort of

There are all kinds of creatures that would try to attack klamath , radscorpions , geckos and other beasts .

Dah! Why Klamath has Trappers? To seek and kill the beasts near and maybe get some profit from doing it.

How can you say there are no raiders in klamath

Just near Klamath(one or two squares, that's near) are no Raiders, but tribals, cannibals etc. I'm pretty sure the Trappers can kill a few cannibals.

The raider are starts near Den, although Klamath is pretty near Den, raiders are not present in the near area of Klamath( again, one or two squares)


and Shady didn't have much more defense than Klamath. They had a wall and a few guards. I think there were less guards in Shady, than there are Trappers in Klamath.

Fine. So raiders aren't a problem in Klamath. But you know what is? The Chosen One on his 674th playthrough of Fallout 2 who has decided he wants to kill off the entire population of Klamath. :twisted: