if you think im someone else,
Do0Fu5@hotmail.com
im sure we can sort out some proof there.
im the mean time, how about you stop picking faults with my spelling and grammer, (mainly bcos i dnt gve a fck) and stick to the subject in hand
Let's pound the VB corpse some more
-
Mr. Teatime
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:07 pm
OK whats the point?Do0Fu5 wrote:if you think im someone else,
Do0Fu5@hotmail.com
im sure we can sort out some proof there.
im the mean time, how about you stop picking faults with my spelling and grammer, (mainly bcos i dnt gve a fck) and stick to the subject in hand
I consider debating with someone who calls himself Do-zero-fu-five (doofus?) a waste of time and energy.
He is also A CONCERNED REGULAR.
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
What does coherency have to do with this?atoga wrote:You're not that coherent yourself, Alex.
Even if I'm not, I am still not bitching about how some site covers its news...
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
i understand that i may have come across as a little loud and over enthusiastic on the top, for which i apologise, but the main point still stands. both sites are full of people who are devoted to fallout, why in gods name are you taking stabs at each other? it is beyond me.
and by posting my e-mail, i hope to prove that any bad name, or reputation i may have earned does not get passed on to anyone who doesnt deserve it. its logic people, come on.
and by posting my e-mail, i hope to prove that any bad name, or reputation i may have earned does not get passed on to anyone who doesnt deserve it. its logic people, come on.
why are you acting like someone with the intelligence of a fucking brick.
im sure there must be pictures, profiles, of the other 2 guys around somewhere. i can prove its not my via webcam. plus, look at my fucking isp. it goes through an NTL station that has 'grim' in its address. which = grimsby for you fundamental idiots
im sure there must be pictures, profiles, of the other 2 guys around somewhere. i can prove its not my via webcam. plus, look at my fucking isp. it goes through an NTL station that has 'grim' in its address. which = grimsby for you fundamental idiots
See you in the wasteland, buddy.Do0Fu5 wrote:why are you acting like someone with the intelligence of a fucking brick.
im sure there must be pictures, profiles, of the other 2 guys around somewhere. i can prove its not my via webcam. plus, look at my fucking isp. it goes through an NTL station that has 'grim' in its address. which = grimsby for you fundamental idiots
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
