Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 8:58 pm
No, I did not.Killzig wrote:Out of the box? Did you miss that bit of my question?
Yes, but not on your 360.Killzig wrote:I can play those games on my PC or better yet on all my old consoles. Tee!
Afraid not.Killzig wrote:I don't?
Yes, the xbox goes hand in hand with the pc, seeing as it's like a barebone with a bunch of stuff stripped from it.Killzig wrote:Not really, I chose the XB because the games library had more of a PC gaming flavor.
I'm not wearing any.Killzig wrote:I'm sure that line is going to get your panties in a bunch but here, there it is.
![icon_eyebrow :eyebrow:](./images/smilies/icon_eyebrow.gif)
Stabbing your PC in the back, you heartless sack of shit.Killzig wrote:Accusing myself of what exactly?
![icon_anger :anger:](./images/smilies/icon_anger.gif)
As I, but there's playing and there's testing.Killzig wrote:Not really interested in that anymore. I have a yob and I've always been very selective about what I play.
Well, see, you confused me rite by saying: every time some shitbag game dev has a wet dream about minigun particle fx. I thought it meant you kept buying into shit over, and over, and over.Killzig wrote:See above.
What, in the same way as "I still play FreeCell"?Killzig wrote:I still play Marble Madness on my NES.
How long a while? Moving into your new apartement 10 years later and finding a dusty old cartridge under a pile of rugs and booting it up for a couple of minutes long while, or what?Killzig wrote:Usually I don't bother playing games again until it's been a long while.
Too true. How about that Operation Flashpoint doh, huh? Huh?Killzig wrote:A mod/"fan patch" that modifies stats on a few weapons and opens up a side quest doesn't really spark my interest enough to slog through 10 hours of gameplay that are basically the same.
Here's the thing, J, you're not supposed to sit around and wait for them like an addict on the coke run. You're supposed to go "Wuh it's released? WICKED!" and boot it up, eh. TC Community spirit 101.Killzig wrote:And TCs that are actually worth the effort are few and far between. Just not my cup of tea.
What, you mean I'm wrong?Killzig wrote:Yay for stereotyping.
No way man, I stay off that shit. It gives me gas.Killzig wrote:I think the curry has gotten to your brain you dot headed leper.
![icon_chew :chew:](./images/smilies/icon_chew.gif)
If you look at the top 10 spots on the güntherweb, sure.Killzig wrote:Hell, the majority of the PC market these days are MMORPG-treadmill running drooling idiots.
What year was that anyway, you cockgobbler? And were you picking based on minimum system requirments per chance?Killzig wrote:As opposed to what I was doing with PC gaming which was picking one or two a year over a handful.
Well, I did say full versions didn't I? I've seen so many great demo's of shit games, not to mention vice versa, that I just don't trust anything but the final product.Killzig wrote:Live's got demos now too, ZOMG!
Why would they have low system requirements? There are foreign and non-consolized games out there that go for the GRAFFIX R COOL approach. And likely small, independent development team games have pretty slow, glitchy code with less bugtesting, meaning ram hogger scripting. Not that they're any worse for that.Killzig wrote:Right, nonstandard games with lower system requirements that I can still play on my PC.
Could you perchance educate me in what clinic removed your brain tumour? I think they mistook one blob of bad cells for another.Killzig wrote:Of course you don't know, you're a drooling idiot. That's why I'm taking the time to explain, I'm a charitable bastard like that.