While not post-apocalyptic, I do feel this is in line with what we do here. I made it awhile back. The first three images were done four years ago, back in high school.
So, I proudly present the Baby Kicker series.
The Baby Kicker: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789087/
The Baby Kicker Strikes Back: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789139/
Return of the Baby Kicker: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789156/
The Baby Kicker's Side Kick: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789172/
The Baby Kicker's Split Kick: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789194/
The Baby Kicker Live in Concert: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789706/
Fall of the Baby Kicker: http://www.deviantart.com/view/5789931/
EDIT: By the way, be sure to read by the comments on some of the pictures made by some chick named Nic-Nic.
The Baby Kicker
The Baby Kicker
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
- the Vault Dweller
-
Ghetto Goose
- Strider of the Wastes
- Posts: 854
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 11:41 am
- Location: High, apple pie, in the sky.
-
Sovy Kurosei
- Vault Veteran
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 10:20 pm
- Location: Canada
- Contact:
Nic Nic is a girl and therefore deserves to die... (unless she could be put to use as a sexslave or do some menial tasks)
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
I've seen pictures of her on her DevArt account. Don't know about her body, but her face is atrocious.Alexander wrote:Nic Nic is a girl and therefore deserves to die... (unless she could be put to use as a sexslave or do some menial tasks)
I know. But it had to end sometime.Kashluk wrote:The Fall of the Baby Kicker made me cry
"You're going to have a tough time doing that without your head, palooka."
- the Vault Dweller
- the Vault Dweller
Interesting series, definitely.
I'd write 'don't let Nic Nic's overly emotional whining phase you', but I doubt it did. From my experience, women tend to react poorly towards violence against infants, small children, small animals and so on and so forth. I'll never understand that, as infants, small children and small animals are amongst the most irritating things in existence. If anything, they deserve a good kick now and then.
I'd write 'don't let Nic Nic's overly emotional whining phase you', but I doubt it did. From my experience, women tend to react poorly towards violence against infants, small children, small animals and so on and so forth. I'll never understand that, as infants, small children and small animals are amongst the most irritating things in existence. If anything, they deserve a good kick now and then.
I know a lady who once - when she was drunk - said that "children are evil dwarves"... I guess she is the exception that proves the rule (or however you say it).
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Whatever... wether it was the evil or goodness or insight of alcohol... the statement is true in a sense. Face the facts!
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
That is preposterous! How is it FALSE!? Do you mean to say that they are "benevolent dwarves"??
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Benevolent ? BENEVOLENT ?
NO !
NO !
NO !
Your misunderstanding is deliberate, isn't it Alex ? All that alcohol has addled your brain a tad, hasn't it Alex ?
Booze is evil, this is truth. I hypothesise that the woman you mention was monetarily possessed by the veritably corporeal nature of the evil of booze, which then seized the opportunity to utter those foul, evil, awful words through her mouth. Poor lass.
NO !
NO !
NO !
Your misunderstanding is deliberate, isn't it Alex ? All that alcohol has addled your brain a tad, hasn't it Alex ?
Booze is evil, this is truth. I hypothesise that the woman you mention was monetarily possessed by the veritably corporeal nature of the evil of booze, which then seized the opportunity to utter those foul, evil, awful words through her mouth. Poor lass.
-
Kashluk
-
Mr. Teatime
- Righteous Subjugator
- Posts: 3340
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 12:07 pm
Agree to disagree.Blargh wrote:Booze is evil, this is truth.
Wait, am I getting this right? You say that the things the woman said regarding children/babies being "evil dwarves" are - in fact - "foul, evil, awful words". While you praised the art exhibited in this thread in an earlier post where you also added that "if anything, they [babies] deserve a good kick now and then". Dont you think that is a tad hypocritical?Blargh wrote:I hypothesise that the woman you mention was monetarily possessed by the veritably corporeal nature of the evil of booze, which then seized the opportunity to utter those foul, evil, awful words through her mouth. Poor lass.
On a side note: You used the word evil far to many times in the last paragraph for it to sound stylish... (consider revising)
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
Thanks. It sure looks as if you improved it though!Retlaw83 wrote:Alexander wrote:A bunch of crapWay to douche up the thread, douchebags.Blargh wrote: A bunch of crap
There are no 'knowns'. There are thing we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say there are things that we now know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know. So when we do the best we can and we pull all this information together, and we then say well that's basically what we see as the situation, that is really only the known knowns and the known unknowns. And each year, we discover a few more of those unknown unknowns.
No, you're not.Alexander wrote:Wait, am I getting this right?
They were motivated by alcohol, hence they are evil by default. The morality of the issue has no bearing upon the words in question, merely their origin : alcohol.Alexander wrote:You say that the things the woman said regarding children/babies being "evil dwarves" are - in fact - "foul, evil, awful words".
Repetition was deliberate, the nuances of which clearly went over your head. 'Koff.Alexander wrote:On a side note: You used the word evil far to many times in the last paragraph for it to sound stylish... (consider revising)
You're most welcome, you burning clot of hatred.Retlaw83 wrote:Way to douche up the thread, douchebags.
