Terminator 4: no returning cast

Mr. Teatime · Post by **Mr. Teatime** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:24 pm

[Film & TV -> Update] - More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... tle=Arnold Schwarzenegger">Person: Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> | More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... title=Nick Stahl">Person: Nick Stahl</a> | More info on <a href="http://wikipocalypse.duckandcover.cx/in ... Terminator 4">Film & TV: Terminator 4</a>

It appears that none of the cast from Terminator 3 will be returning in Terminator 4. <a href="http://www.scifi.com/scifiwire2005/inde ... >According to Sci Fi Wire</a>,

<blockquote>
Nick Stahl, who played John Connor in 2003's hit Terminator 3: Rise of
the Machines, told SCIFI Wire that neither he nor T3 co-star Claire
Danes will appear in a proposed fourth Terminator movie. "I'm not going
to be in T4," Stahl said in an interview while promoting his latest
film, the upcoming Sin City. "None of the cast is coming back." Stahl
said that the producers' current plans may not even include original
Terminator star Arnold Schwarzenegger, who is now the governor of
California.

Stahl added: "The [T4] story is changing conceptually. I
believe it's a jump to the future, so my character will be quite a bit
older. That's all that I know. So I'm not coming back, which is a drag.
I don't know much more than that." Stahl took over the role of the
youthful future leader of the rebellion against Skynet from Edward
Furlong, who originated the role in 1991's Terminator 2: Judgment Day.

</blockquote>
I don't think any of the cast returning are necessary for Terminator 4, given the proposed time difference between the film and its predecessor. Schwarzenegger returning would be nice, though, as would having James Cameron direct - neither of which are likely to happen.

<blockquote>
</blockquote>
Spotted @ <a href="http://freezedriedmovies.com/">Freeze Dried Movies Dot Com</a>

Nicolai · Post by **Nicolai** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:26 pm

Phew, no Loken.

avenger69ie · Post by **avenger69ie** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 1:30 pm

i just hope it doesnt turn out like starship troopers sequel. T3 was a big fucken letdown for me.. the only good thing about it was the bunker scene at the end.

Brother None · Post by **Brother None** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:08 pm

Not even Dr. Peter Silberman travelled through time? They should at least have a "Here rests Dr. Peter Silberman, terminally insane" headstone somewhere in the film.

Pope Viper · Post by **Pope Viper** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:34 pm

That would be hilarious.

POOPERSCOOPER · Post by **POOPERSCOOPER** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:57 pm

I didnt like those kids in T3 anyways. T3 should of been in the future anyways, so atleast its good that their actually getting to it.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:24 pm

POOPERSCOOPER wrote:I didnt like those kids in T3 anyways. T3 should of been in the future anyways, so atleast its good that their actually getting to it.

I agree.

T3 was an utterly needless film, and the commercials were very misleading; I was under the impression most of it would occur after Skynet took over.

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:35 pm

yeah well don't watch ads.

whats the point in a terminator film if it doesn't have arnolt in?

POOPERSCOOPER · Post by **POOPERSCOOPER** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:17 pm

Maybe Arnold will be all CGI, and go back to being the bad guy.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:34 pm

And not wear fucking star sunglasses.

Post by **Alexander** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:38 pm

T3 was not good, and having Nick Stahl and Clare Danes star in it didnt help... so good riddence I say!
But all Terminator-movies need Arnold even if its just a cameo!

Mad Max RW · Post by **Mad Max RW** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:54 pm

The only part of T3 that wasn't completely awful was the very end. No happy save the world, everybody lives in harmony bullshit. Nukes start flying and you know they're fucked.

With such a good premise already setup for T4, they'll still find a way to fuck it up.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:54 pm

S4ur0n27 wrote:And not wear fucking star sunglasses.

If anything, they should just have the Terminator that Arnold plays in its robot form as a main character throughout the movie, and it should always be wearing star-shaped sunglasses.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:26 am

The only good part was Arnold going throught the wall with a coffin on his shoulder.

boywoos · Post by **boywoos** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 4:10 am

I think Paul W.S Anderson should direct it.

Post by **Alexander** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 6:18 am

boywoos wrote:I think Paul W.S Anderson should direct it.

No, yuck. He made Aliens vs Predator!

Paul Verhoeven should direct it! That would be the best.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 8:10 am

Alexander wrote:
boywoos wrote:I think Paul W.S Anderson should direct it.
No, yuck. He made Aliens vs Predator!

Paul Verhoeven should direct it! That would be the best.

Verhoeven is the fucktard who made Starship Troopers a masturbation session for 12 year old boys because he refused to read the source material so it didn't "taint" his vision of what the movie should be.

Megatron · Post by **Megatron** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:14 am

starship troopers was good. so was robocop.

i hope will smith is in it. aw hell naw!

Post by **Retlaw83** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 11:31 am

Megatron wrote:starship troopers was good. so was robocop.

i hope will smith is in it. aw hell naw!

Robocop was good. The movie Starship Troopers might as well have been called "Spoiled Frat Kids with Guns," as the only thing it has in common with the book are character names and alien bugs.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Thu Feb 03, 2005 2:59 pm

and a tatoo lol