Duck and Cover

Minimum System Requierments:
-Processor: Intel or AMD, 2 GHz
-Operating System: Windows 2000/XP
-Memory: 1024 MB RAM
-Disk Space: 4.5 GB
-Graphics Card: 128 MB DX9.0c compatible card,
-GeForce 6200 or higher
-Radeon 9600 or higher
-Sound Card: DirectX 9.0c compatible
-CD-ROM or DVD-ROM drive : x2 read speed


Is it worth purchasing a computer from NASA to play it with more than four FPS?

That's basically identical to Oblivion. Does it have soil erosion as well?

If it does,well, in that case you know the answer.

Is it a good straight FPS or one of those sneaky shit pseudo FPS?

Besides the min specs are like for a 3or4year old machine, you can get a very decent PC for about 700-800€. You are Jesus, you should be able to afford that sum.

1024MB of RAM as minimum

I'm running.

-Processor: AMD64, 3000+
-Memory: 1024 MB RAM
-Graphics Card:GeForce 6800

It runs poorly with the setting at "Ubber Low".

Thor Kaufman wrote:Is it a good straight FPS or one of those sneaky shit pseudo FPS?

It is much like the first GR but a bit suckyer (not that it really sucks, just GR1 was freakin fantasmic). You actually have health, you can get shot in the head with a pistol three times before it hurts you. That and it seems kind of glitchy. Other than that it seems pretty intense (I dunno I've only done the first two missions). It's just another FPS.

Jesus Christ wrote:I'm running.

-Processor: AMD64, 3000+
-Memory: 1024 MB RAM
-Graphics Card:GeForce 6800

It runs poorly with the setting at "Ubber Low".

Thor Kaufman wrote:Is it a good straight FPS or one of those sneaky shit pseudo FPS?

It is much like the first GR but a bit suckyer (not that it really sucks, just GR1 was freakin fantasmic). You actually have health, you can get shot in the head with a pistol three times before it hurts you. That and it seems kind of glitchy. Other than that it seems pretty intense (I dunno I've only done the first two missions). It's just another FPS.

My setup is similar. How's it look on ubber low?

Very choppy. It tends to slow down alot if there is lots going on (like a big fire fight).

Maybe it's meant that way, you know, as a parapsychological illusion similar to that in Saving Private Ryan. Or if it's not, just pretend it's bullet time.

I'm sure if you turn off some 3d shadow thingy, it'll run better.

if you covered your computer in margarine, it would run butter.

Your tech support is shoddy and unhelpful.

Install Windows 2000 -- the game will most likely run in 2x of the normal speed, possibly on the highest settings.

runs fine on my new 360 in HD, suckahs.

Thanks for all the tips...

I'm just going to try installing the patch and see if that helps. Until than, I probably will not play it again until the next Sunday or latter. It's fun, but not enough to spend my precious few spare hours on the weekdays playing it, it’s more of a time killer game.

I played the GRAW demo right after I had been playing SWAT4 for awhile and I saw the commands for your teammates and I was a bit tired of doing that so I stopped. I remeber it running pretty bad on my computer and it looks horrible at lower settings.

Who would of thought Killzig would become a console whore?

POOPERSCOOPER wrote:I played the GRAW demo right after I had been playing SWAT4 for awhile and I saw the commands for your teammates and I was a bit tired of doing that so I stopped. I remeber it running pretty bad on my computer and it looks horrible at lower settings.

Who would of thought Killzig would become a console whore?

I held out for as long as I could. But ... most of the major titles (read: resource hogs) that I am interested in playing (RS: Vegas, GRAW, Mass Effect, Bioshock, FO3) will all likely be available on the 360. With the console I have the added bonus of the social element. Like this weekend we were sitting around playing Rockstar's Table Tennis. Which was pretty addictive, finally -- pong gets updated. I think Rise of Legends and AoE3 are also coming to the 360, how good that'll be -- I don't know. But basically, if most of the major titles (resource hogs) I want to play will be coming to a console near me then I have no reason to spend 500$ on a GFX card/ram/upgrades for my pc when I can spend the same amount on an all in one kit that's going to save me the aggravation of installation/patches/drivers/etc.

Now the only things I play on my PC are the oldies like Fallout, Arcanum, etc... recently I reinstalled Bloodlines to give it another run through ... I think the majority of my PC gaming, though, is going to be stuff like Space Rangers 2. More niche market games that aren't going to task my machine but offer the world as far as gameplay goes. That leaves my PC's hd pristine for work, piracy and just about whatever else I want to use it for. I just don't have a reason to come back to PC gaming. -- unless Fallout 3 is PC only. and yeah, I am fully expecting it to suck but it's Fallout and I can't say no.

Looks like the gaming industry finally won.

VasikkA wrote:Looks like the gaming industry finally won.

meh. too much money involved for gaming to not go corporate. Keep supporting games like Space Rangers 2 and only purchasing the quality AAA title.

Success tends to corrupt game developers, so I'd be careful who to support if at all. Nival Interactive is such a whore nowadays, for example.

VasikkA wrote:Success tends to corrupt game developers, so I'd be careful who to support if at all. Nival Interactive is such a whore nowadays, for example.

obviously the answer is for all of us to burn all our worldly and material possessions in some giant global bonfire and live as monks. We can roam around the country side extolling the virtues of poverty and thanking God for the beauty that is nature.

You should stay for awhile, killzig.