Page 1 of 1

The bank Job

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:07 am
by POOPERSCOOPER
I saw it tonight and it was pretty entertaining definitely better than most of the crap I've been seeing at the theaters lately. It's not a "awesome movie" but more of a solid money worths type of movie if you catch my drift.

Of interesting note is Jason Stratman is pretty darn short and should probably market himself better or it could reflect negatively on his career. The main girl in the movie was about 6 inches taller than him.

Re: The bank Job

Posted: Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:47 pm
by Frater Perdurabo
POOPERSCOOPER wrote:It's not a "awesome movie" but more of a solid money worths type of movie if you catch my drift.
You say that about every piece of shit movie that you review. Does it mean that this one will be another smoldering lump?

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 2:51 am
by POOPERSCOOPER
You know my dad complains that when he asks if I liked sometimes or how somethign went I'm always like "it was okay" or "it was alright" you have to look deep and read my undertone of my voice I guess.

If I say "ya, it was alright" then it means it was pretty good. If I say okay then generally its only average. I have a really small scale of review spectrum butts.


It's good go see it NOWWWWWw.

I should probably give up on my movie critic career :sniff:


Also, Frater please tell me what movie that I informed or badly judged and you spent your money on. I'm somewhat interested.

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 4:22 am
by johnnygothisgun
i liked it. the commercials had me expecting an italian job/ocean's 11 kind of movie, and i was pretty shocked to find that it was nothing like that. it was still entertaining, though

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 11:05 am
by Patrick
POOPERSCOOPER wrote:
I should probably give up on my movie critic career :sniff:
:pray:

Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 8:54 pm
by cazsim83
POOPERSCOOPER wrote: I should probably give up on my movie critic career :sniff:
why? because of one dumbass critic critique-ing your critique?

it's a review. tell them to get over it and keep pumping out the reviews, poops. don't give in to the dipshit critics who abound here at DaC :hug:

Posted: Mon Mar 24, 2008 12:23 am
by Jeff
pump up the jam homez, your reviews are top chit around these parts :salute:

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:06 pm
by Frater Perdurabo
POOPERSCOOPER wrote:You know my dad complains that when he asks if I liked sometimes or how somethign went I'm always like "it was okay" or "it was alright" you have to look deep and read my undertone of my voice I guess.

If I say "ya, it was alright" then it means it was pretty good. If I say okay then generally its only average. I have a really small scale of review spectrum butts.


It's good go see it NOWWWWWw.

I should probably give up on my movie critic career :sniff:


Also, Frater please tell me what movie that I informed or badly judged and you spent your money on. I'm somewhat interested.
You didn't bash Jumper enough : (
http://www.duckandcover.cx/forums/viewt ... 82&start=0

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 4:23 pm
by VasikkA
I agree with Frater, your rating system could use a bit refinement. The undertones are intelligible, but most of the movies you review seem to be 'pretty good', which is a bit too vague. Or, it could be that all movies today are in fact 'pretty good' and then its not really your fault. Don't worry, I'll still read all your reviews.


Which picture of Rex would best describe the movie?

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:36 pm
by hat_man99
VasikKa i just read heaps on rex lol
Is this guy still around?