Blatant Zionist Propaganda?
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:38 pm
The second oldest Fallout gaming community, online since 1998, keeping warm in the nuclear glow.
https://duckandcover.cx./forums/
lolwut? fo' real ma nigga?Dogmeatlives wrote:It actually pisses me off.
Fo' real!Thor Kaufman wrote:lolwut? fo' real ma nigga?Dogmeatlives wrote:It actually pisses me off.
I think there is danger in just ignoring this and going on with business. There have been alot of movies like this that have come out, well, since the early eighties. Crude, tasteless, demoralizing, sexist, and racist films disguised as comedies. Call me insane but all of these disgusting comedies do nothing less than help to degrade the moral values of the United States.cazsim83 wrote:It's Adam Sandler - he's the Eminem of movies, amirite? R U surprised?
Oh I definitely agree about the lack of any true democracy. A democracy with more than five people becomes a mob.Thor Kaufman wrote:That sounds a bit far fetched, I doubt it's part of a bigger zionist plan, but then again, who knows, eh. For me it's just another nobrain comedy but maybe it's actually clever and wants to make you think about it by being EXTREME, or whatever.
Just because it isn't politically correct because a jew obviously mustn't play a jew doesn't make it a worse comedy movie. Do you get all worked up when american Indy puts out his american whip and whips some commie/nazi ass?
Propaganda happens all the time, can't help it.
Also, democracy is a farce, anyway, it's just a game, you vote for some shithead who doesn't care about you. But it's a nice ruse, at least and lets you think you actually have influence.
As long as it's not bad enough and people still have enough to eat and feel safe (safety is just a mere feeling) everything will stay status quo.
So the problem doesn't even lie in uneducation, i.e. if one believes democracy is a farce.
If one thinks otherwise, though, the problem lies in uneducation and nothing else because if you can't think critical and don't know about history history is going to repeat itself which it will probably anyway.
NIHILIST RAMBLINGS
Suppose that (i) p is true or p is false and (ii) not-p is true or not-p is false.
Then p is true or not-p is true.
Now suppose that in 1900 one person says that a sea-battle will take place on 1/1/2100, and another says that a sea-battle will not take place on 1/1/2100.
Then either what the first person says is true or what the second person says is true.
But, in that case, either it is necessary in 1900 that a sea-battle takes place on 1/1/2100, or it is necessary in 1900 that one does not take place.
But the date of the predictions is irrelevant, and it is irrelevant whether any prediction is actually made at all.
So it is necessary at all times that a sea-battle takes place on 1/1/2100, or that a sea-battle does not take place on 1/1/2100.
My thoughts exactly, it's always about power, basically. The simplest formula to put it.Dogmeatlives wrote: I don't believe it's some zionist plan. I believe it's about power. To make it simple I will describe it like this. Certain like-minded people want to control alot of the world, so right now they are initiating a campaign to weaken the human as a whole.
RACIST RACISTDogmeatlives wrote:It's funny you mention that. It's often said that the Irish have a fatalistic view of existence. :Dogmeatlives is Irish:
Translation: Fuck it.Suppose that (i) p is true or p is false and (ii) not-p is true or not-p is false.
Then p is true or not-p is true.
Now suppose that in 1900 one person says that a sea-battle will take place on 1/1/2100, and another says that a sea-battle will not take place on 1/1/2100.
Then either what the first person says is true or what the second person says is true.
But, in that case, either it is necessary in 1900 that a sea-battle takes place on 1/1/2100, or it is necessary in 1900 that one does not take place.
But the date of the predictions is irrelevant, and it is irrelevant whether any prediction is actually made at all.
So it is necessary at all times that a sea-battle takes place on 1/1/2100, or that a sea-battle does not take place on 1/1/2100.
like you said, censorship is basically a Pandora's boxDogmeatlives wrote:I'm torn on censorship. I'm not for it at all (Ihang out in DAC) yet I am for social responsibility. If a person or persons cannot display any responsibility for the shit they spew, then maybe they should be censored. The problem there is that the "shit" in question is very subjective.
Is pornography shit? or is religion? Personally i believe that both are to be cast out, but who am I? The title of a Jackie Chan movie? or just a person with my own views based on my experiences?
You see, the Socialist Dictator in me is often confused by the armchair philosopher in me.
Thor Kaufman wrote:like you said, censorship is basically a Pandora's boxDogmeatlives wrote:I'm torn on censorship. I'm not for it at all (Ihang out in DAC) yet I am for social responsibility. If a person or persons cannot display any responsibility for the shit they spew, then maybe they should be censored. The problem there is that the "shit" in question is very subjective.
Is pornography shit? or is religion? Personally i believe that both are to be cast out, but who am I? The title of a Jackie Chan movie? or just a person with my own views based on my experiences?
You see, the Socialist Dictator in me is often confused by the armchair philosopher in me.
Yes? ...yes!Hey, France and Germany? You think we're shitheads? Defend your own fucking country and we'll take our money with us, assholes.