Living Anatomy
Posted: Sat May 24, 2003 3:39 am
Many people seem to recomend it, but is it really that good? +5 to damage sounds nice, but isn't it to max damage? Plus, I have to sink all those points into doctor. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467f8/467f8d6bcbe886452d916758c7865f01218e1b95" alt="icon_sad :("
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/467f8/467f8d6bcbe886452d916758c7865f01218e1b95" alt="icon_sad :("
The second oldest Fallout gaming community, online since 1998, keeping warm in the nuclear glow.
https://duckandcover.cx./forums/
Does that mean for every shot in a burst you get +5?Kashluk wrote:The bonus +5 damage comes as an addition, even to the maximum damage of your weapon.
yes, that's how the rules work.ArchVile wrote:Does that mean for every shot in a burst you get +5?Kashluk wrote:The bonus +5 damage comes as an addition, even to the maximum damage of your weapon.
I guess so, but that doesn't make a whole lot of sense, ruleswise.cowpaste wrote:Are you sure it's each shot of burst? I was reading Per's guide today, and there is this:
"When using burst weapons, each bullet is treated individually when it comes to penetration, damage etc., so it's possible to fire full auto and not do very much damage against an armoured opponent. (Try the 10mm SMG on the aliens in Redding and you'll see what I mean.) This also makes the perk Bonus Ranged Damage more useful, but Living Anatomy does not add damage to each bullet."
So maybe living anatomy merely adds +5 to your total damage at the end. That probably explains why I haven't seen a really huge difference in bursting before and after living anatomy. Maybe I just haven't tested it enough. I dunno.