Page 1 of 1

FBOS Vs. FO3

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2003 2:13 pm
by Cipher
Well, I recently have been reading info and looking at pictures of the upcoming release of FBOS and I must say... it looks like complete sh!t.

I really X 10,000 hope that all of the people involved with FBOS have absolutly nothing to do with the development of FO3 or FO3 will be doomed before it even finishes.

Some times I really wonder what in the hell these people are thinking when they come out with crap like FBOS. FO:T was at least some what decent but FBOS looks rediculouse.

Am I the only one with these worries or what?

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:03 pm
by Dan
BIS is working on Fallout 3 (Van Buren).

Fo:BoS is made by another company (also interplay) But not the same people.

Posted: Sat Jul 26, 2003 4:11 pm
by Cipher
Righty-o captain. I know they are different games I am just saying I hope that none of the FBOS nonsense is put into FO3/VanBuren.

It just amazes me how these diptard companies can take a game that became very popular and then completly screw it up by making additional games that are so different from the original that the fans (mighty finance providers of first 2 titles) cringe at the thought of playing it.

Think about it they release 2 awsome RPG's that are great and then they release 2 non rpg's that one (Tactics) is okay and some what fun and one that seems like it will be even more of tract than what made it popular in the first place.

I am glad that Interplay doesn't own Disney land otherwise we might start seeing disney porno theme parks.......hmmmmm......

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 12:59 am
by Megatron
post it in the right forum next time diptard

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 11:41 am
by Cipher
Megatron wrote:post it in the right forum next time diptard
What are you talking about bitch? This has to do with Fallout 3, wizz shit. :lol:

You arn't some FBOS fanboy are you? It should be renamed to FBS (Fallout Bull Shit)

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 12:21 pm
by Dan
There is and there will be some confusion as to where threads should go, as there is theoretical Fallout 3 disscussion and Van Buren disscussion.

Hopefully, Iply would announce Van Buren as Fallout 3 soon, so we can make a new forum and then all the threads would have their place.

I'm not moving it yet.

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 12:38 pm
by Cipher
Boy, it will really suck if Interplay announces Van Buren as something like Baldurs gate 3 or some nonsense. It almost wouldn't supprise me the way Interplay has been.

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 3:37 pm
by Slave_Master
You arn't some FBOS fanboy are you? It should be renamed to FBS (Fallout Bull Shit)
I prefer FO:POS.
Boy, it will really suck if Interplay announces Van Buren as something like Baldurs gate 3 or some nonsense.
For BG3, doubtful, since they don't have the BG license anymore. I think that it will be FO3, but closer in spirit to BG or what have you then actual Fallout.

Posted: Sun Jul 27, 2003 6:16 pm
by Raymondo
Well VUGames have been known to milk licences. Just look at what they're doing with their LOTR's licence.

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2003 11:00 pm
by Cipher
Slave_Master wrote:
You arn't some FBOS fanboy are you? It should be renamed to FBS (Fallout Bull Shit)
I prefer FO:POS.
Boy, it will really suck if Interplay announces Van Buren as something like Baldurs gate 3 or some nonsense.
For BG3, doubtful, since they don't have the BG license anymore. I think that it will be FO3, but closer in spirit to BG or what have you then actual Fallout.
Hmmm, that would suck. I do wonder a little bit though about interplays ability to make another good FO game without the original minds.

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2003 12:15 am
by Slave_Master
Go read the news section and see how much fun Mr. Sawyer is having with the SPECIAL system, then you'll see how well Iplay can make another FO game.