Complete and Utter bullshit cover-up

Janus Matchell · Post by **Janus Matchell** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:28 am

Hey there folks although you may already know this but as of thursday there was a mushroom sized cloud in N.Korea thursday. And only nukes cause mushroom sized clouds. Heres the link to prove that the world is still indeed full of bullshit especially coverups such as this:
http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/story. ... loc=NW_3-T

Please comment.

Burnov · Post by **Burnov** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:29 am

I saw a headline on this today.

Seems pretty shady to me.

What the hell else would make a blast and a pillar of smoke that big?

Is the DPRK making their own version of MOAB? I doubt it.

Mismatch · Post by **Mismatch** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 12:31 am

some geologist here in sweden said that a nuke'd have given seismic readings on them seismographs... or whatever they're called in english.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:48 am

Janus Matchell wrote:Hey there folks although you may already know this but as of thursday there was a mushroom sized cloud in N.Korea thursday. And only nukes cause mushroom sized clouds. Heres the link to prove that the world is still indeed full of bullshit especially coverups such as this:
http://cnn.aimtoday.cnn.com/news/story. ... loc=NW_3-T

Please comment.

It would have to be a very small nuke to make a mushroom-sized cloud, seeing as though mushrooms aren't that big.

Mad Max RW · Post by **Mad Max RW** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:51 am

Saw this early today. A 3 kilometer explosion shaped like a mushroom cloud and leaves a crater visible from satellites....yup nothing to worry about.

Lunchmeat · Post by **Lunchmeat** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 1:57 am

Mismatch wrote:some geologist here in sweden said that a nuke'd have given seismic readings on them seismographs... or whatever they're called in english.

According to the article there were seismic readings.

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:04 am

Yeah I don't think a mushroom sized explsion would be very threatening.

Yeah. Whatever. I hope they're building nukes. Lest we forget, SOUTH Korea instigated the Korean war by threatening the north, it just couldn't back up its claims. Add some fireworks to global politics.

OMG COMMENTZ

SuperH · Post by **SuperH** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:01 am

What do you people mean by "musroom sized" what size exactly do you mean by "mushroom"?

Mushroom is a shape, and it's created because gas in the center is hotter and rises faster than the other crap.

It happens when gasoline goes up too.

Anyway, everyone knows NK has nukes who cares?

Btw I haven't even bothered to read the article

Lunchmeat · Post by **Lunchmeat** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:14 am

Speaking of countries with nukes, I read that Iran has plans of processing enough plutonium to make 4-5 nuclear warheads.

Janus Matchell · Post by **Janus Matchell** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:44 am

SuperH wrote:What do you people mean by "musroom sized" what size exactly do you mean by "mushroom"?

Mushroom is a shape, and it's created because gas in the center is hotter and rises faster than the other crap.

It happens when gasoline goes up too.

Anyway, everyone knows NK has nukes who cares?

Btw I haven't even bothered to read the article

The problem with NK having nukes is that they will not be afraid of using them on us. Which in turn will bring our retaliation and then China will get involved and then we strike china then its a nice pretty spider web of vapor trails and mushroom clouds.

Janus Matchell · Post by **Janus Matchell** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:46 am

SuperH wrote:What do you people mean by "musroom sized" what size exactly do you mean by "mushroom"?

Mushroom is a shape, and it's created because gas in the center is hotter and rises faster than the other crap.

It happens when gasoline goes up too.

Anyway, everyone knows NK has nukes who cares?

Btw I haven't even bothered to read the article

The problem with NK having nukes is that they will not be afraid of using them on us. Which in turn will bring our retaliation and then China will get involved and then we strike china then its a nice pretty spider web of vapor trails and mushroom clouds. Btw I know you talking out of your ass so snaw! Also always read topic discussion please.

Blargh · Post by **Blargh** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:19 am

Janus, stop, and attempt to think, just a for a minute. Okay ?

Right, North Korea, despite almost certainly possessing nuclear capability, would be particularly silly to employ their weapons outside of having someone else launch on them first. Why ? Because they are quite aware that any aggressive action(s) they take would be responded in kind to, by possibly multiple foreign powers.

Nuclear technology as it is now, any action would leave just enough time for the unfortunate target to launch their own ICBMs et al, or get on the blower to a friend who could do so by proxy. Because of this, the greatest value of nuclear capabilities is undoubtedly that of bluster.

Janus Matchell wrote:Btw I know you talking out of your ass so snaw!

That is rich.

Kashluk · Post by **Kashluk** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:02 pm

The thing is, that this Klingon-Weong Lim whatever Korean King dude is actually mad enough, that he wouldn't propably much care if there was a counter-strike to be expected the minute he launches his missiles...

... but on the other limb, they'll propably never manage to gather enough resources to build a nuclear weapon with the range of a Scud-missile, much less an ICBM. So don't worry too much.

Post by **Retlaw83** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:50 pm

Kashluk wrote:... but on the other limb, they'll propably never manage to gather enough resources to build a nuclear weapon with the range of a Scud-missile, much less an ICBM. So don't worry too much.

Last year, or perhaps the year before that, they successfully tested a medium-range missile with enough go-juice to reach Japan.

Kashluk · Post by **Kashluk** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 3:00 pm

Wow. That'd be like 3-4 times the range of a Scud. I'm impressed.

S4ur0n27 · Post by **S4ur0n27** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:56 pm

I just read that the explosion was planned and wasn't nuclear. They had to blow up part of a mountain for an hydroelectric project.

Hell, even Colin Powell said NK wasn't doing nuclear tests. South Korea said the same.

Mismatch · Post by **Mismatch** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 6:25 pm

S4ur0n27 wrote:I just read that the explosion was planned and wasn't nuclear. They had to blow up part of a mountain for an hydroelectric project.

Hell, even Colin Powell said NK wasn't doing nuclear tests. South Korea said the same.

da.
they just mentioned this on the news..
NK even invited forign diplomats to inspect the site of the explosion.

Kashluk · Post by **Kashluk** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 8:18 pm

I guess even the Koreans are starting to be more concerned about issues like eating and bathing instead of global thermonuclear warfare.

Mismatch · Post by **Mismatch** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 9:15 pm

mebbe a certain north american country should follow their example.....

jetbaby · Post by **jetbaby** » Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:23 pm

OMG GAIS ARE U DUM?!1? JANUS SAIZ NUKZZZZ

Seriously. Colin Powell said that there was no evidence of nuclear tests FROM THE BEGINNING, Janus. Oh, and your bit about them actually having nukes and willing to use them on everyone was already covered well.

Duck and Cover

Complete and Utter bullshit cover-up

Complete and Utter bullshit cover-up

Re: Complete and Utter bullshit cover-up

dumbass

dumbass