Page 10 of 12
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 5:28 pm
by Subhuman
Wheat fields represent peace and stability, while the gladiator lives a life of violence and turmoil. JUXTAPOSITION, peeps.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:11 pm
by Aonaran
"I don't mean to argue with or attack you kids, obviously everybody has their tastes and nobody's gonna convince anybody of anything. But that comment about "DAWN OF THE DEAD REMAKE is this generation's ALIENS" and some of these other posts got me thinking about it. I just gotta point out this generation gap because I think Zack Snyder, at least based on these first two movies, is the perfect symbol of it. A talented guy, but all surface, apparently doesn't even know that there is an area beneath the surface where you can put things. And a generation of kids who for the most part would RATHER have it that way. If there was a way to just take the gloss off of a glossy magazine cover, they would be mainlining that shit. Because the brain thinks about movies different when it also has to have time for extensive critical thought about ringtones." ~ Quint
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:26 pm
by Megatron
Subhuman wrote:Wheat fields represent peace and stability, while the gladiator lives a life of violence and turmoil. JUXTAPOSITION, peeps.
gladiators have also been genetically proven to like wheat. like when mf doom gets up in the morning he has wheat on bread. rome was extremely wheatey.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:53 pm
by johnnygothisgun
uh i dont know about that? actually no on all counts, it was supposed to be the elysian fields, which are the greco-roman equivalent of heaven, you people just need to read more
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:16 am
by Subhuman
Does it matter? The makers of Gladiator didn't know that shit, they just thought wheat fields looked pretty.
God, that movie blew ass. Why did we even bring it up?
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:20 am
by vendetta
I dunno..
My point was just that any epic movie about some kind of historical moment (especially Greek ones, since they seem so trendy right now) all have stupid wheat fields in them. I know what they try to symbolise with them, but isn't there another way to do it (especially since all Hollywood historical movies are the same)?
Heck, include Mel Gibson movies in there too.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:36 am
by Dogmeatlives
Would you prefer strawberry fields forever? Gladiator reminded me of a car commercial. Don't ask why but please agree.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 6:18 am
by johnnygothisgun
Subhuman wrote:Does it matter? The makers of Gladiator didn't know that shit, they just thought wheat fields looked pretty.
wtf, what are you
what
they obviously did know that, dummy, thats exactly why they put it in. are you trying to sound like psychosniper or something. the elysian fields are where virtuous peoples go when they die. maximus was a virtuous man, so when he died, he went there. his wife and son were virtuous people, so when they were killed, they went there. thusly, when maximus got there, he met up with them - i didnt think it was a particularly difficult concept to grasp, that of elysium
edit: you dumb poop face, the musical track that plays during that sequence is even called 'elysium'
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 8:17 am
by VasikkA
PsychoSniper wrote:Wheat fields suck.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:19 pm
by Subhuman
johnnygothisgun wrote:the elysian fields are where virtuous peoples go when they die. maximus was a virtuous man, so when he died, he went there. his wife and son were virtuous people, so when they were killed, they went there. thusly, when maximus got there, he met up with them - i didnt think it was a particularly difficult concept to grasp, that of elysium
edit: you dumb poop face, the musical track that plays during that sequence is even called 'elysium'
You know far too much about a shitty movie.
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 2:26 pm
by jetbaby
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 5:07 pm
by johnnygothisgun
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 12:04 am
by Blargh
An awful film ties into, with the faintest of nods, a fairly generic aspect of Greco-Roman mythology, that knowledge logically becomes film trivia ?
Clearly, Darryl is a <pejorativeepithet>.
In other news, a 30ft gecko has been seen consuming tonnes of SOCKS in Prague.
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:40 am
by Subhuman
If only Blargh put as much effort into being funny as he does being quirky.
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:03 am
by Blargh
To not evoke
your . . . sense of humour ? That strikes as a relief. Truly.
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 5:26 am
by Subhuman
See, that was close.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:22 pm
by Atrokkus
Seen "300" yesterday, at a local cinema (non-IMAX). A masterpiece. Enough said.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:27 pm
by jetbaby
ATROKKUS HAS SPOKEN
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:32 pm
by VasikkA
I retract my words, it is a masterpiece.
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:22 pm
by S4ur0n27
I'm taking my lil brother to it, tonight